Saturday, 18 February 2012

Zombies Versus Vampires

I work for a very well known academic publisher and when I first started wokring there I dutifully signed up to all of their online community boards. I trawled through pages and pages of sales and music and just general interest related ones before finding one of the most popular ones was the ******* Zombie Response Team. I immediately joined and discovered hundreds of similar minded people who discussed the pros and cons of various methods of survival. We even had people who were editors of Biology and Chemistry titles discussing the science behind whether it was safe to eat fish or not!! 

This made me realise that a interest in Zombies wasn’t unusual amongst all circles of people, but given that the Zombie is such a horrible thing, why was there not a similar interest in Vampires.?

The idea of the vampire has been with us for a very long time, but since Polidori wrote his infamous “Vampyre” short story in 1819 they have been embedded within our popular culture. Since then, the Vampire has become firmly established as the rock star of the monster world., Attracting huge fan bases of people idolising them, Vampires have become one of the staples of modern fiction. It’s impossible to list the modern fiction and films that recount tales of these monsters, but the most prolific at the moment is the ‘Twilight’ series.

    I will admit, I love these books, they fulfill a basic need and desire within myself to believe that this kind of relationship can exist. The vampire part is entirely secondary. I realise however that as an intelligent adult (I hope) this is entirely irrational. The novels are written from a very conservative approach; Bella’s virginity and the integrity of her soul is paramount to Edward, and these values strongly reflect the author’s beliefs. The main character stalks and mentally abuses his love interest and in any other scenario this would be entirely unacceptable, but even I find myself buying in to the ‘romance’ of it all.

           Since these books were published the vampire genre exploded again and the plethora of very similar fiction chokes the market. Most of these continue to idolise the monster and nullify our horror at their behaviour. As I will explain below this is incredibly dangerous and actually more influential to behaviour than any violent video game.

          Like the Vampire, the concept of a Zombie has been around for a very long time, but it wasn’t until 1968 and “Night of the Living Dead” that the Zombie hit popular culture and fundamentally changed the face of horror.

      I have been fascinated by Zombie fiction and films since I was a child and I have watched and read countless books and films. Even though I’m not the best at computer games, I’ve sat their and played zombie games with a friend (to do the difficult bits) for years, relishing in the terror I feel as I’m chased and then eventually surrounded.

    For me, the Zombie connects in a completely different way than the Vampire. Zombie fiction has nothing to do with love, or hero worship or the desire to be beautiful forever. It reaches in to the very pit of your stomach and rips whatever trepidation you had out of you. You can’t run forever and in the end it’s about survival (and blood and getting to carry really cool guns).

    The traditional Zombie story is about the inexplicable rise of the dead, they are everywhere and they are unstoppable. There is always a woman, some cannon fodder and the capable would be survivor.. and a house with too many windows and a basement that you can’t escape from.

    The modern world however has created some stories which are revolutionary in their designs. “28 Days Later”  introduced the idea that these monsters weren’t dead, they were sick, and importantly for me looked at how this would affect the UK. It fed my fears about our habit of wanting to ‘free’ things that are caged and the lack of firearms available in our society. The concept that these people weren’t actually dead also made the horror seem a little more real than having to suspend the disbelief in magic.

    The “Resident Evil” films and games also looked at this idea of a virus although their infected were very much dead. The genius part of this story was the dark and technically rich power that still controlled the world even after the Apocalypse and the idea of the troubled superhero to fight them.
    Since then there have been a multitude of books and films, some of the best from my perspective include films like “Colin”, a low budget British film shot from the perspective of the Zombie, and the series “The Walking Dead”. “The Walking Dead” in particular as not only does it have a very capable character who uses a cross bow (which is legal in the UK - and my dad builds them!) but also confronts the idea of morality and suicide. The gang members fighting to protect the residents of a nursing home, the woman questioning the morality of having a baby in the post apocalyptic world, the concept that the zombie’s are sick people rather than monsters, and the horror of your own child becoming a zombie.

    Then of course there is Max Brook’s “The Zombie Survival Guide” and the key message here is that there is no cure and to survive training and using sheep to guard your compound is paramount... As you can see there is a very common theme among all of these movies, games and books. There is no hope, there is no cure, and in the end they will get you.
    This leads me very nicely to Mark Tufo’s work, “Zombie Fallout”. This series has been written by a true Zombie believer and survivalist. At this point I’m going to show my true colour as a Zombie fan and say that we - the Zombie fans - all know that if this happened in real life the only people equipped to survive are ourselves. We know that news reports of widespread biting and violence all mean one thing - if your American get your gun - if your British get your cross bow - and if your Scottish like me, get the cross bow and hide out in your conveniently located island castle that is just opposite your house.

    Mark Tufo has injected a strange yet funny sense of humour to the genre but most importantly introduced entirely new ideas.
    If Zombies - the living dead - can be real, why can’t other monsters be real?
   
    A regular person would have at this point put a vampire in to the mix, Mark Tufo put a Zombie Vampire - genius and his series has certainly hit all of the right notes in terms of thrills and revelations. . By the way if you haven’t read these yet, go out and get them from Amazon.
    So where does this take us, we have tales of the living dead, people sick from a  disease that causes violence, governments overthrown, evil powers still in place, survivalist and normal people trying to survive. What does this mean, and what lessons can we take from this? Is our obsession with the Zombie a backlash against the normalisation of subjugation and violence in our society? Are we looking at the Zombie as the surefire consequence of genetic engineering and pandemic disease?

    Personally I see it as a backlash against the normalisation of monsters in our society. We have vampires being seen as heroes, genocide in Rwanda and Darfur and terrorists perpatrating horrible crimes upon the world. The bad guys are hard to identify and there is a real fear of the perpetrators within our midst.
    So what does this mean?
    Ahhh …..who the hell cares, all I knows is that Zombies fans kick vampire fans butt every time, and that I’ve got my plans in place for when it all goes down.

Do you?